those are two extremes... i think i'd rather be a somewhat somebody that makes okay money haha
what is a "someone"? you're someone! you're bert. okay that's stupid.
we've chatted about this before, and i feel the same way. i notice it recently in the form of wanting to pursue some creative outlet. that's so strange for me because i was never an artist or craftsman. i think i just want something different.
I, too, am in the middle of this muddle. I mean, even with a "family" this problem goes on. Maybe its because I make so little that I would rather make a lot and be a nobody, because fame and recognition is not something I desire. But I may be bitter about different things. Hopefully we will both come up with a solution that fits...
Fame stinks. First of all, it's fleeting, moreso than money is. Secondly, if you're really famous you get bothered all the time by paparazzi and random fans, "Hey, aren't you Bert Chi? Can I have your autograph? Can I have my picture taken with you." You have to fight to have a private life. Everything you do is under intense scrutiny. Money's much better. You can do something philathropic with it. Using money, you can actually wield power or get fame if you want it. Money's much better. Of course, it's the root of all evil, but what can you do?
be a nobody that makes a lot of money--and then give some of that money to a charity anonymously! or, you can give that money to me! hehehe. besides, you'll always be a somebody to someone.
love you!
just marry rich.
i think it's more a sense of significance rather than fame that i'm looking for. a sense that i'm doing something cool, or at least interesting. one advantage is that i've worked long enough to afford a break, i.e. do the first option to make the second option possible.
if i knew my parents didn't care and my soulmate didn't care (or was rich), then it'd be a no-brainer. the money will always be there or always be available, but time, youth, and independence will not be.
take advantage that you are can pursue your "selfish" interests -- not being tied by particular relationships, not being completely invested in work. that's not going to be the case when you do have the family, really build a career. wasn't it albert schweitzer who set out to commit to personal pursuits until he was 30, and then devote the rest of his (long) life to humanity?
in regards to having more pressure as a guy rather than a girl to do the more practical things [response to a comment on your march post] - i don't know. people who love you will want you to be happy. and oftentimes, things that you think they'll be upset/disappointed about don't last, or aren't as bad as you think they'll be.
how you ever read _what should i do with my life?_ by po bronson? sorta addresses some of the life questions that you're asking. doesn't offer a solution (how could it), but sorta like a choose your own adventure - interesting to see the paths that people have taken w/o committing. his narrative, approach were things i could mostly relate to, which was reassuring. [another book that was recommended that i didn't take to at all (_quarterlife crisis_, by alexandra robbins) was helpful for a couple of friends.]
a fellow in his 20s going thru a reexamination of his life, uncertain about his direction/career/future is normal. if you put things off and are going thru similar things in your late 30s,+ i'd be more concerned in the relationship dept. not all girls are looking for guys in stable work positions, good income, house with a white picket fence. or maybe i'm just strange.
I can totally relate and am struggling with the same thing myself. It's so infuriating that certain fields and talents are so much more financially rewarding than others, even though they are not inherently more valuable. Sigh....
Comments (9)
those are two extremes... i think i'd rather be a somewhat somebody that makes okay money haha
what is a "someone"? you're someone! you're bert. okay that's stupid.
we've chatted about this before, and i feel the same way. i notice it recently in the form of wanting to pursue some creative outlet. that's so strange for me because i was never an artist or craftsman. i think i just want something different.
I, too, am in the middle of this muddle. I mean, even with a "family" this problem goes on. Maybe its because I make so little that I would rather make a lot and be a nobody, because fame and recognition is not something I desire. But I may be bitter about different things. Hopefully we will both come up with a solution that fits...
Fame stinks. First of all, it's fleeting, moreso than money is. Secondly, if you're really famous you get bothered all the time by paparazzi and random fans, "Hey, aren't you Bert Chi? Can I have your autograph? Can I have my picture taken with you." You have to fight to have a private life. Everything you do is under intense scrutiny. Money's much better. You can do something philathropic with it. Using money, you can actually wield power or get fame if you want it. Money's much better. Of course, it's the root of all evil, but what can you do?
be a nobody that makes a lot of money--and then give some of that money to a charity anonymously! or, you can give that money to me! hehehe.
besides, you'll always be a somebody to someone. 
love you!
just marry rich.
i think it's more a sense of significance rather than fame that i'm looking for. a sense that i'm doing something cool, or at least interesting. one advantage is that i've worked long enough to afford a break, i.e. do the first option to make the second option possible.
if i knew my parents didn't care and my soulmate didn't care (or was rich), then it'd be a no-brainer. the money will always be there or always be available, but time, youth, and independence will not be.
take advantage that you are can pursue your "selfish" interests -- not being tied by particular relationships, not being completely invested in work. that's not going to be the case when you do have the family, really build a career. wasn't it albert schweitzer who set out to commit to personal pursuits until he was 30, and then devote the rest of his (long) life to humanity?
in regards to having more pressure as a guy rather than a girl to do the more practical things [response to a comment on your march post] - i don't know. people who love you will want you to be happy. and oftentimes, things that you think they'll be upset/disappointed about don't last, or aren't as bad as you think they'll be.
how you ever read _what should i do with my life?_ by po bronson? sorta addresses some of the life questions that you're asking. doesn't offer a solution (how could it), but sorta like a choose your own adventure - interesting to see the paths that people have taken w/o committing. his narrative, approach were things i could mostly relate to, which was reassuring. [another book that was recommended that i didn't take to at all (_quarterlife crisis_, by alexandra robbins) was helpful for a couple of friends.]
a fellow in his 20s going thru a reexamination of his life, uncertain about his direction/career/future is normal. if you put things off and are going thru similar things in your late 30s,+ i'd be more concerned in the relationship dept. not all girls are looking for guys in stable work positions, good income, house with a white picket fence. or maybe i'm just strange.
I can totally relate and am struggling with the same thing myself. It's so infuriating that certain fields and talents are so much more financially rewarding than others, even though they are not inherently more valuable. Sigh....
Comments are closed.